on
RE:
With the possibility to add dashboards and reports in the app, having only one layer of sections is a bit thin. Would be good to have the possibility of several layers of sections to distinguish where reports and/or dashboards can be grouped under but it would for example also be possible to create subsections by workstream or brand names, etc possibilities are very limited now with only a single layer of sections
RE:
This would be awesome. I mean, I understand PBI refreshing TableA+B if you refresh either TableA or TableB, but when you update just TableA+B, why does it need to load everything again? And don't get me started on the preview load... why can't we limit how many lines it loads?
RE:
check also this:
https://experience.dynamics.com/ideas/idea/?ideaid=90b987bb-0920-ea11-b265-0003ff68bbbc
REP 296 has an advantage which the background posting doesn't offer ... you can use the "Request Page" and for example specify to "Post Invoice" only (if shipment has been registered.
But in case one document fails the entire btach fails and then the job queue has to be restarted again manually.
It's okay that a document fails and the user has to do adjustments before this document gets posted.
But at the same time the job queue should remain "Ready"
RE:
This suggestion will significantly improve the administration processes and ensure actions on workers can be completed in full in one go.
RE:
It's true that at the end you cannot post the journal line:
However ... I think it's better to check as early in the process as possible
RE:
Why not having 2 or more apps from one workspace? So one can customize app for the users needs.
There are often the same parts of reports that are useful for different levels of employees.
Please add multiple apps per workspace!!
RE:
Having a link to the article would also be great so you could look other information related to the article. At the moment you don't have the Article ID so it is hard to even find the article if you need to. Definitely very low productivity at the moment. Really surprising since KBs have been around a long time and this one is definitely nowhere near the market leaders.
RE:
Should note it should read "33100 = 33.1K (not 33.10K)".
RE:
I would prefer being able to copy the table as text, and paste it into Outlook, instead of copying a screen shot.
RE:
"Vendorname" Inv. "External Doc No" "GLACCName"