on
RE:
Hi Francisco,
Please elaborate the requirement as it is not descriptive enough to understand and think further for this requirement.
RE:
To achieve the purpose, we generally create a separate Journal name and in the Journal control setup, only Account type Bank are allowed to ensure that only Bank to Bank transactions can be done through this journal. This way we fulfil the given purpose.
RE:
This requirement is somewhat confusing!
You want to get the records after filtering with Vendor account. The path provided: Accounts Payable >> Payments >> Vendor Payment Journals is just to open the form for making payments.
In case you want to filter the posted journals that are having the particular vendor, you can use the Advanced Filter Option on the form and add join with table VendTrans , thereafter you can filter with particular vendor.
For unposted journals, the record is not saved in the vendor trans, so a report in the General Ledger Module with name "General Journals that have not been posted" can fulfil your purpose; in that report all the unposted ledger journals can be checked.
OR
if you are asking about some report, please provide the correct path if i have mistakenly understood the requirement.
RE:
Seems like a completely reasonable request. If people have demanded access to this feature for the Power BI Service you can safely assume those of us paying for and using premium embedded services would like this service too!
RE:
Without resolution of these issues, we are not able to suggest this feature of correction in the bank reconciliation form to any of our customers. Please consider the same for better implementation of this feature as it helps customer to pass the correction entries without need to create a separate general for it (as this was the original thought process behind the feature).
RE:
Related party name is very much required while doing the bank reconciliation manually from the system. It helps to ensure that correct lines are being reconciled with reference to party. Since, it is available for normal one to one line entry, there might be some design flaw that it is not working for multi lines entries. It is request to Microsoft team to consider this requirement.
RE:
Essential.
RE:
Essential.
RE:
This would be a great feature
RE:
Most organisations, and especially any medium to large business, has many layers. With Chairman then CEO the Board, that already takes up 3 layers and that doesn't even get to the senior management team, let alone hiring managers at a mid-tier level and the teams that sit into them.
This would be a really powerful tool if more layers were added into the functionality/could be viewed straight as one immediate view.
Thanks.